|
New York State Weatherization
Directors' Association (NYSWDA) Legislative Position
2006
We believe strongly in the
following:
1 - We
believe that the DOE Weatherization Program is a good expenditure of
public dollars because it "works". It benefits the
low-income clients served as well as society at large.
We believe
that the Weatherization Program has moved from a program that simply
helps low-income families to a program that has national security
implications.
The President has called for our nation to reduce our dependence on
imported oil. Our clients do not have the financial resources to
weatherize their own dwellings and thus, for the benefit of all
Americans, it makes for good public policy to support the DOE
Weatherization Program. Conservation is the cheapest energy.
Therefore we call for the
federal government to restore the DOE Weatherization budget and to
consider increasing funding for this important federal program going
forward.
Facts to support our position
from National Studies by Oak Ridge National Labs and WapTac's Website
- Weatherization saves
an average of 30.8% in gas space heating according to Oak Ridge Fuel
Studies. Click Here
for more information on fuel studies performed by Oak Ridge National
Labs.
- Each Year the 11,000
homes and apartments weatherized in New York State save in excess of $5
million dollars in energy costs.
- Weatherization
addresses more than the heating loads, we now address the Electric
Baseloads as well
- Weatherization
addresses many Health & Safety issues found in the homes weatherize
such combustion appliances that are not drafting properly, Carbon
Monoxide issues, smoke alarms, etc.
- Taken together, for
every $1 invested in the Program, Weatherization returns $2.60 in
energy and non-energy related benefits.
- Weatherization
creates 52 direct jobs and 23 indirect jobs for every $1 million
invested.
- For every $1
invested by DOE, the Program leverages $1.54 in other federal, state,
utility and private resources. Agencies use leveraged resources to
weatherize more low-income homes and to deliver more services while in
the home
- Installed
measures continue to benefit the client long after federal dollars
have been expended
New York still has an
additional 1.4 million households eligible for Weatherization. We
have a long way to go to serve all eligible households and
provide energy efficient homes for all NY families.
2 - We believe
it makes for good public policy to use a portion of HEAP funds for long
term benefits by using a portion of the states grant for Weatherization.
Weatherization of low income housing units can save more dollar per year
than the typical HEAP grants thus doubling the impact on the low income
family's budget. Therefore we support the portion of HEAP
funds appropriated for Weatherization to be increased to 25% as some other
states have done.
Facts to
support our position
- HEAP recipients far too often live in
dwellings that are not weatherized. These homes can often use
10-15 times as much energy as homes that are energy efficient.
HEAP grants can have a much larger impact on a family if their home is
weatherized. Click Here
for detailed explanation.
- For information on how
the Weatherization Program relates to the HEAP Program see the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory report on non-energy benefits of the Program -
ORNL CON 486
3 - We
applaud the NY Legislators for supporting HEAP with surplus state funds
this year. But with the high cost of energy, (the current energy
crisis in NY is our "Katrina") and with the long waiting lists agencies
have for Weatherization services, New York legislators needs to think "long
term" and provide funds to increase the number of homes weatherized.
NY needs long term solutions as well as short term solutions.
Therefore we support the idea of NY State allocating state funds to
support Weatherization at the same level that HEAP was supported,
$100,000,000 but put into a trust fund to allow Weatherization to spend
over time in a wise manor.
Facts to support this
position
- Again the same
arguments apply as the previous issue. It does not make sense to
provide HEAP grants to homes with no insulation. Many low income
homes use 15 times as much energy per heated square foot as the best
Energy Star homes that many upper middle class families live in.
Click Here for more details.
- NY State has the distinction of being
the state with the highest low income population in a state with high
heating degree days
4
- We believe that the Weatherization Program is no
longer simply a program that helps low-income families but is a
program that now has national security implications.
We therefore call on the federal government to increase the funding for
the Weatherization Program, not cut the program as the Presidents budget
has done.
Facts to support this
argument
- The President has
called for our nation to reduce our dependence on imported oil.
Our clients do not have the financial resources to weatherize their own
dwellings and thus, for the benefit of all Americans, it makes for good
public policy to support
the DOE Weatherization Program.
- Weatherization
measures reduce national energy demand by the equivalent of 18 million
barrels of oil per year according to DOE.
-
Energy Conservation is
much cheaper than alternative fuel sources.
5
- We believe that the era of cheap Oil and Natural Gas
energy sources are over. Energy Conservation is more important in
2006 than at any time in history. We therefore call on our
state and federal legislators to support low-income energy conservation.
Facts to support this
point.
- There has been a great
deal of media coverage on the concept of "Peak Oil" and "Peak Natural
Gas" lately. Though the concept has its critics it has now gained
legitimacy after a 2005 study commissioned by the Department of
Energy referred to as the Hirsch Report.
Click Here for summary of the
Hirsch Report
- The concept of "Peak Oil" is now being
discussed on the floor of congress by congressman Bartlett and Udall and
others.
Click Here for important details and speeches by various Congressmen
on Peak Oil
- Peak Oil issues now being reported by
the NY Times and other major publications as well as the Oil Companies.
Click Here for information and
links on Peak Oil issues.
- "Domestic oil production peaked in
1970 and continues to decline. Proved domestic reserve lifetime for oil
is about 3.4 yrs. World oil production is at or near its peak and
current world demand exceeds the supply. Saudi Arabia is considered the
bellwether nation for oil production and has not increased production
since April 2003." This is a quote from the U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and is dated September 2005 and available on one of the
Military Servers at
http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=A440265&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
What NYSWDA Staff is doing for
the Network on
Legislative Issues - Click Here
Please take the
time to visit the links on this page, there is a great deal of important
information contained on these links that relate to Weatherization
|